Table
of
Answers
for
Topics
55.
What
terms
are
absent
in
the
wisdom
of
Kabbalah?
From
the
beginning
to
the
end
of
the
wisdom
there
is
not
even
a
single
word
that
relates
to
any
tangible
or
imaginary
term,
such
as
space,
time,
motion
and
so
on.
Also,
there
is
no
absence
in
spirituality,
and
any
change
of
form
does
not
mean
that
the
first
form
is
absent.
Instead,
the
first
form
remains
in
its
place
unchanged
at
all
and
the
disparity
of
form
that
has
now
been
acquired
is
added
to
the
first
form.
(The
beginning
of
Inner
Light)
56.
What
is
the
ordinary
language
in
the
wisdom
of
Kabbalah?
This
language
is
a
“Language
of
Branches”
that
points
to
their
Upper
Roots.
That
is
because
“You
haven’t
even
a
single
blade
of
grass
below
that
has
not
a
root
above.”
Therefore,
the
sages
of
the
Kabbalah
have
put
together
a
language
that
is
equipped
to
imply
through
the
branches
and
teach
of
the
Upper
Roots.
(Inner
Light,
page
1
and
the
beginning
of
Inner
Observation,
item
1)
57.
What
separates
and
discriminates
in
the
wisdom
of
Kabbalah?
The
disparity
of
form
distinguishes
and
departs
the
spirituals
from
one
another.
(Inner
Light,
item
30)
58.
What
is
the
origin
of
the
“will
to
receive?”
The
will
to
bestow
in
the
upper
light
necessitates
the
existence
of
the
will
to
receive
in
the
emanated
being.
(Inner
Observation,
item
11)
59.
What
makes
the
light
exit
the
emanator
and
become
an
emanated
being?
This
innovated
part
stopped
being
regarded
as
the
Emanator
and
became
an
emanated
being
because
of
the
form
of
the
will
to
receive
that
was
innovated
with
the
upper
light,
since
it
wants
to
bestow.
(Inner
Observation,
item
11
&
item
15)
60.
What
is
the
first
substance
of
every
emanated
being?
The
new
form
that
emerged
existence
from
absence,
meaning
the
“will
to
receive”
that
is
in
every
essence,
is
the
“first
substance”
of
every
emanated
being
and
every
essence.
Moreover,
everything
that
exists
in
the
emanated
being
or
in
the
essence
that
is
more
than
that
substance,
is
regarded
as
light
and
abundance
that
extends
from
the
upper
light
“existence
from
existence”
and
not
at
all
as
an
emanated
being
and
a
created
being.
It
is
not
surprising
that
a
form
becomes
a
substance,
because
it
is
so
in
corporeality
as
well.
Our
conduct
is
to
regard
the
first
form
of
the
essence
as
the
first
substance.
That
is
because
there
is
no
attainment
whatsoever
in
any
matter
in
the
entire
reality,
since
our
senses
perceive
only
incidents
in
the
matter,
which
are
forms
that
incarnate
and
manifest
in
the
first
substance.
(Inner
Observation,
item
35)
61.
From
which
time
is
it
regarded
as
an
emanated
being?
It
stops
being
an
Emanator
and
becomes
an
emanated
being
right
at
the
beginning
of
the
formation
of
the
will
to
receive
in
the
emanated
being,
called
phase
four
in
the
desire.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
3)
62.
Has
a
spiritual
that
accepted
a
disparity
of
form,
by
which
a
part
of
it
departed
and
became
a
different
phase,
lost
anything
because
of
that?
There
is
no
absence
or
loss
in
spirituality.
The
part
that
departs
because
of
the
change
of
form
does
not
diminish
or
lessen
the
upper
light
in
any
way;
rather,
it
is
like
lighting
one
candle
from
another;
the
first
is
not
lessened
whatsoever.
Thus,
any
change
of
form
is
an
addition
to
the
first.
(Inner
Observation,
Part
2,
regarding
the
integration
of
Ten
Sefirot
in
every
Sefira)
63.
How
and
in
whom
are
there
many
forms
and
changes
in
the
worlds?
All
the
changes
and
the
multiplications
are
carried
out
only
by
the
impact
of
the
light
on
the
vessels
that
receive
it.
However,
the
upper
light
in
and
of
itself
remains
in
complete
rest,
meaning
unchanged
and
without
any
innovation.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
1)
64.
How
are
innovation
and
movement
depicted
in
the
light?
There
is
no
movement,
meaning
innovation,
in
the
upper
light.
Instead,
the
part
that
the
emanated
being
receives
from
the
upper
light
is
what
becomes
“innovated”
and
multiplies
(like
lighting
a
candle
from
another
without
the
first
lessening),
according
to
the
new
forms
in
the
vessels.
Each
receives
according
to
the
degree
of
its
own
desire,
which
changes
from
to
the
other
and
cascades
from
one
to
the
other
incessantly
and
immeasurably.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
1)
65.
How
are
all
the
opposites
and
the
multitude
of
forms
that
extend
from
Him
to
the
worlds
contained
in
His
simple
unity?
See
Inner
Observation
item
18
and
item
29.
66.
By
whom
and
by
what
is
the
line
extended
from
Ein
Sof?
The
screen
is
a
detaining
force
that
was
placed
on
phase
four
after
the
restriction
to
prevent
her
from
receiving
inside.
That
is
what
caused
the
emergence
of
the
line
from
Ein
Sof,
because
the
upper
light
is
never
subject
to
change,
and
it
shines
after
the
restriction
as
it
did
before
the
restriction.
However,
now
the
above
screen
caused
the
upper
light
to
be
received
only
in
the
three
phases
of
the
desire
whose
measure
is
very
small
compared
to
the
reception
in
phase
four
in
Ein
Sof.
For
that
reason
it
received
only
a
thin
line
of
light
compared
to
the
measure
of
the
light
in
Ein
Sof.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
1)
67.
Has
anything
changed
in
Ein
Sof
after
the
restriction
as
well?
Although
phase
four
in
Ein
Sof
restricted
herself,
still
there
is
no
issue
of
putting
on
a
form
or
taking
one
off
in
the
absence
of
the
first,
as
it
is
in
corporeality.
Instead,
there
is
an
issue
of
a
new
form
that
is
added
to
the
first,
without
the
first
form
changing
at
all,
as
there
is
not
absence
in
anything
spiritual.
Thus,
this
entire
innovation
of
the
departure
of
the
light
and
the
detaining
force
that
was
performed
in
phase
four
to
avoid
receiving
light
inside
her
is
regarded
as
a
new
and
distinguished
world.
It
is
added
to
the
light
of
Ein
Sof,
which
remained
as
it
was
without
any
change.
You
should
infer
from
that
regarding
every
new
form
in
spirituality.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
1)
68.
When
has
the
coarseness
in
phase
four
been
uncovered?
When
the
line
that
comes
from
Ein
Sof
was
detained
from
shining
in
phase
four
by
the
screen.
Because
she
remained
without
light,
the
coarseness
in
her
became
apparent.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
3)
69.
What
are
the
four
phases
in
the
will
to
receive?
First
the
light
from
the
emanator
expands
as
light
of
Hochma,
being
the
general
vitality
that
belongs
to
that
emanated
being.
Inside
it
there
is
phase
one
in
the
will
to
receive,
called
the
first
expansion
or
phase
one
After
that
the
will
to
bestow
increases
in
that
light,
which
in
turn
draws
light
of
Hassadim
from
the
emanator.
This
is
called
the
first
intensification,
or
phase
two.
Afterwards
that
light
of
Hassadim
performs
a
great
expansion,
namely
with
illumination
of
Hochma.
This
is
called
the
second
expansion
or
phase
three.
After
that
the
will
to
receive
that
is
included
in
the
light
from
the
first
expansion
intensifies
and
completes
the
measure
of
the
will
to
receive.
This
is
called
the
second
intensification
or
phase
four.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
70.
What
are
the
four
letters
of
HaVaYaH?
The
Yod
of
HaVaYaH
is
the
first
expansion
of
the
light,
called
phase
one
(see
item
69).
The
first
Hey
of
HaVaYaH
is
the
first
intensification
in
the
light,
called
phase
two.
The
Vav
is
the
second
expansion
or
the
light,
called
phase
three,
and
the
last
Hey
of
HaVaYaH
is
the
second
intensification
in
the
light,
called
phase
four.
(Inner
Observation,
item
31)
71.
What
is
the
upper
beginning
of
the
line
that
touches
Ein
Sof?
See
item
49.
72.
What
is
the
single
thought
that
contains
all
the
forms
and
the
opposites
in
the
entire
reality?
It
is
the
thought
“to
delight
His
created
beings.”
(Inner
Observation,
item
22)
73.
Where
do
the
sages
of
the
Kabbalah
begin
to
engage?
Kabbalah
speaks
only
of
the
expansion
of
the
light
from
Himself,
though
in
Himself,
we
haven’t
any
word
or
uttering.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
2)
74.
What
are
the
two
primary
rudiments
that
contain
everything?
The
first
rudiment
is
that
the
entire
reality
before
us
is
already
set
and
exists
in
Ein
Sof
in
its
utter
perfection.
This
is
called
the
light
of
Ein
Sof.
The
second
rudiment
is
the
five
worlds
called
Adam
Kadmon,
Atzilut,
Beria,
Yetzira,
Assiya,
which
cascade
from
Malchut
of
Ein
Sof
after
the
restriction.
Anything
that
exists
in
the
second
rudiment
extends
from
the
first
rudiment.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
3
and
Inner
Observation,
item
5)
75.
What
is
the
meaning
of
“He
is
One
and
His
Name
One?”
“He”
indicates
the
light
in
Ein
Sof.
“His
Name”
implies
the
will
to
receive
in
Ein
Sof,
called
Malchut
of
Ein
Sof.
“One”
indicates
that
there
is
no
disparity
of
form
whatsoever
detected
there
between
the
light,
which
is
“He”
and
the
vessel,
which
is
“His
Name.”
Rather,
it
is
all
light.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
30
and
Inner
Observation,
item
13)
76.
What
is
the
name
“Ein
Sof?”
Before
the
restriction,
the
name
Ein
Sof
implies
that
there
is
no
Sof
or
Sium
(end)
there
whatsoever,
since
phase
four
receives
the
light
as
well.
Thus,
in
that
place
there
is
no
reason
to
stop
the
light
and
form
a
Sof
and
Sium.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
20)
77.
What
extends
from
the
will
to
receive
that
is
contained
in
Ein
Sof?
The
creation
of
the
worlds
and
their
entire
contents.
It
restricted
itself
in
phase
four
in
order
to
uncover
the
worlds
down
to
this
world,
where
it
is
possible
to
turn
the
form
of
reception
into
a
form
of
bestowal.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90
and
Inner
Observation,
item
17)
78.
What
is
the
reason
for
the
restriction
of
the
light?
Malchut
of
Ein
Sof
regarded
the
equivalence
of
form
with
her
Maker
as
embellishment,
which
could
only
be
achieved
by
the
creation
of
the
worlds.
That
is
why
she
restricted
herself.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
40
and
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
79.
Which
kind
of
reception
would
be
regarded
as
bestowal?
Reception
only
because
it
gives
contentment
to
the
giver.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
80.
What
is
the
purpose
of
the
restriction?
To
turn
the
form
of
reception
into
the
form
of
bestowal.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
81.
Why
did
the
light
leave
the
middle
point
and
never
returned?
See
Inner
Light
Part
1,
Chap
1
item
40
and
Inner
Observation
item
22.
82.
Why
didn’t
the
restriction
create
a
Sof?
The
restriction
was
not
because
of
the
disparity
of
form
that
appeared
in
the
will
to
receive
that
wanted
to
correct
it.
It
was
only
because
of
the
embellishment,
without
any
necessity
and
coercion.
83.
Why
did
the
light
depart
from
all
the
phases
during
the
restriction?
Because
there
is
no
some
(part)
in
spirituality.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
70)
84.
Why
weren’t
the
four
phases
mentioned
as
four
degrees
one
below
the
other
during
the
restriction
and
before
the
appearance
of
the
line?
Before
the
illumination
of
the
line
phase
four
did
not
regard
herself
as
thick
and
low
(see
item
83).
For
that
reason
there
is
no
issue
of
the
impact
she
has
on
the
degrees.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
85.
Why
did
phase
four
not
become
coarse
immediately
at
the
restriction
of
the
light,
and
all
four
phases
remain
equal?
Because
the
restriction
did
not
occur
due
to
a
disparity
of
form.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
86.
Which
phase
remains
empty
of
light?
Only
phase
four.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
2,
item
3)
87.
When
will
phase
four
also
be
filled
with
light?
When
the
vessels
of
reception
acquire
the
form
of
bestowal.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
40)
88.
What
caused
the
creation
of
the
worlds?
The
will
that
is
necessarily
there
had
a
desire
to
embellish
itself
and
resemble
the
form
of
the
light
completely,
and
that
became
the
“cause”
for
the
creation
of
the
worlds.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
89.
What
is
the
desired
purpose
of
Torah
and
good
deeds?
To
make
the
vessels
of
reception
work
in
order
to
bestow.
(Inner
Observation,
item
22)
90.
What
is
the
power
of
the
disclosure
of
the
Holy
Names?
Their
power
is
specifically
to
turn
the
form
of
reception
into
bestowal.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
90)
91.
How
do
the
Holy
Names
reveal?
By
laboring
in
Torah
and
good
deeds.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
40)
92.
What
is
the
end
of
correction?
The
turning
of
the
form
of
reception
into
a
form
of
bestowal.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
40)
93.
What
is
the
root
of
every
corruption?
The
disparity
of
form
of
the
will
to
receive
from
the
emanator.
(Inner
Observation,
item
18)
94.
Why
is
it
not
possible
to
turn
a
vessel
of
reception
into
a
vessel
of
bestowal
except
here
in
this
world,
and
not
in
the
Upper
Worlds?
Corruption
and
correction
in
the
same
carrier
exist
only
in
this
world.
(Inner
Observation,
item
20)
95.
What
are
the
two
phases
of
the
light?
Light
of
Hochma
and
light
of
Hassadim.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
96.
What
does
the
expansion
of
the
light
from
the
emanator
contain?
The
will
to
bestow
and
the
will
to
receive.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
97.
Which
light
appears
with
the
intensification
of
the
will
to
bestow?
Light
of
Hassadim.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
98.
Which
two
lights
are
contained
in
every
emanated
being?
Light
of
Hochma
and
light
of
Hassadim.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
99.
Why
is
light
of
Hassadim
inferior
to
light
of
Hochma?
Because
it
is
extended
by
the
intensification
of
the
desire
of
the
emanated
being.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
100.
When
is
the
vessel
of
reception
completed?
When
phase
four
of
the
desire
appears,
which
is
the
great
will
to
receive.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
101.
What
is
the
difference
between
one
who
receives
within
and
one
who
receives
without,
as
in
Ein
Sof?
The
one
who
receives
within
can
only
hold
within
a
limited
amount
of
light,
because
of
the
limitation
of
the
vessel.
When
receiving
without,
the
vessel
does
not
limit
the
light
that
it
holds,
and
it
is
without
ration.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
50)
102.
What
are
Sefirot
of
circles?
When
there
is
no
differentiation
of
above
and
below
among
the
four
phases
in
the
desire,
they
are
regarded
as
four
circles
one
within
the
other,
like
onionskins.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
100)
103.
Why
are
the
degrees
in
circles
not
regarded
as
being
one
below
the
other
before
the
appearance
of
the
line?
Because
the
restriction
did
not
occur
because
of
the
inferiority
of
the
disparity
of
form.
(Inner
Light,
Part
1,
Chap
1,
item
100)
104.
Is
there
evil
in
the
will
to
receive
by
the
nature
of
its
creation?
There
is
no
inferiority
in
it
by
the
nature
of
its
creation,
nor
would
it
appear
in
it
had
it
not
been
restricted.
(Inner
Observation,
item
19)
105.
What
does
“Indirect
extension”
from
the
Emanator
mean?
See
Inner
Observation,
item
19.